{"response":{"status":"ok","message_type":"publication"},"id":1243,"citation":"Lin et al., 2017, Plant Pathology","doi":"10.1111/ppa.12692","url":"https://api.seqco.de/v1/publications/1243.json","link_ext":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12692","title":"Quantification and ecological study of ‘\n \u003ci\u003eCandidatus\u003c/i\u003e\n Liberibacter asiaticus’ in citrus hosts, rootstocks and the Asian citrus psyllid","journal":"Plant Pathology","journal_loc":"66 (9)","journal_date":"2017-12-01","pub_type":"journal-article","abstract":"\u003cjats:p\u003e\n The use of proper management strategies for citrus huanglongbing (\n \u003cjats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"\u003eHLB\u003c/jats:styled-content\u003e\n ), caused by ‘\n \u003cjats:italic\u003eCandidatus\u003c/jats:italic\u003e\n Liberibacter asiaticus’ (Las) and transmitted by Asian citrus psyllid (\n \u003cjats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"\u003eACP\u003c/jats:styled-content\u003e\n ) (\n \u003cjats:italic\u003eDiaphorina citri\u003c/jats:italic\u003e\n ), is a priority issue.\n \u003cjats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"\u003eHLB\u003c/jats:styled-content\u003e\n control is based on healthy seedlings, tolerant rootstock cultivars and reduction of\n \u003cjats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"\u003eACP\u003c/jats:styled-content\u003e\n populations. Here, dynamic populations of Las in different citrus hosts and each instar of\n \u003cjats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"\u003eACP\u003c/jats:styled-content\u003e\n were studied, together with the seasonal growth and distribution of Las in different tissues, using conventional and TaqMan real‐time\n \u003cjats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"\u003ePCR\u003c/jats:styled-content\u003e\n . Different levels of susceptibility/tolerance to\n \u003cjats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"\u003eHLB\u003c/jats:styled-content\u003e\n were seen, resulting in different degrees of symptom severity and growth effects on hosts or rootstocks. Troyer citrange, Swingle citrumelo and wood apple were highly tolerant among 11 rootstock cultivars. Regarding distribution and seasonal analysis of Las, mature and old leaves contained high concentrations in cool temperatures in autumn and spring. Las was detected earlier through psyllid transmission than through graft inoculation, and the amounts of Las (\n \u003cjats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"\u003eAOL\u003c/jats:styled-content\u003e\n ) varied in different hosts. Thus, different\n \u003cjats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"\u003eAOL\u003c/jats:styled-content\u003e\n (10\n \u003cjats:sup\u003e4\u003c/jats:sup\u003e\n –10\n \u003cjats:sup\u003e7\u003c/jats:sup\u003e\n copy numbers μL\n \u003cjats:sup\u003e−1\u003c/jats:sup\u003e\n ) and Las‐carrying percentages (\n \u003cjats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"\u003eLCP\u003c/jats:styled-content\u003e\n ; 40–53.3%) were observed in each citrus cultivar and on psyllids, respectively. Furthermore, both\n \u003cjats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"\u003eAOL\u003c/jats:styled-content\u003e\n and\n \u003cjats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"\u003eLCP\u003c/jats:styled-content\u003e\n were lower in nymphs than in adult psyllids, whereas the\n \u003cjats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"\u003eLCP\u003c/jats:styled-content\u003e\n of psyllids were not affected by increasing the acquisition‐access time. The present study has significant implications for disease ecology. The combination of early detection, use of suitable rootstocks and constraint of psyllid populations could achieve better management of\n \u003cjats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"\u003eHLB\u003c/jats:styled-content\u003e\n disease.\n \u003c/jats:p\u003e","long_citation_html":"Lin et al. (2017). Quantification and ecological study of ‘\n \u003ci\u003eCandidatus\u003c/i\u003e\n Liberibacter asiaticus’ in citrus hosts, rootstocks and the Asian citrus psyllid.\n\u003ci\u003ePlant Pathology\u003c/i\u003e.\n\u003ca href=\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12692\" target=\"_blank\"\u003eDOI: 10.1111/ppa.12692\u003c/a\u003e\n","created_at":"2019-04-15T19:27:56.293Z","updated_at":"2025-11-06T13:36:13.857Z","authors":[{"id":17176,"given":"C.‐Y.","family":"Lin","created_at":"2025-11-06T13:36:13.864Z","updated_at":"2025-11-06T13:36:13.864Z","url":"https://api.seqco.de/v1/authors/17176.json"},{"id":17177,"given":"C.‐H.","family":"Tsai","created_at":"2025-11-06T13:36:13.876Z","updated_at":"2025-11-06T13:36:13.876Z","url":"https://api.seqco.de/v1/authors/17177.json"},{"id":17178,"given":"H.‐J.","family":"Tien","created_at":"2025-11-06T13:36:13.886Z","updated_at":"2025-11-06T13:36:13.886Z","url":"https://api.seqco.de/v1/authors/17178.json"},{"id":17179,"given":"M.‐L.","family":"Wu","created_at":"2025-11-06T13:36:13.897Z","updated_at":"2025-11-06T13:36:13.897Z","url":"https://api.seqco.de/v1/authors/17179.json"},{"id":17114,"given":"H.‐J.","family":"Su","created_at":"2025-11-06T11:29:46.437Z","updated_at":"2025-11-06T11:29:46.437Z","url":"https://api.seqco.de/v1/authors/17114.json"},{"id":17110,"given":"T.‐H.","family":"Hung","created_at":"2025-11-06T11:29:46.396Z","updated_at":"2025-11-06T11:29:46.396Z","url":"https://api.seqco.de/v1/authors/17110.json"}],"names":[{"id":1,"name":"Liberibacter asiaticus","url":"https://api.seqco.de/v1/names/1.json","uri":"https://seqco.de/i:1"}],"subjects":[{"id":5,"name":"Agronomy and Crop Science","url":"https://api.seqco.de/v1/subjects/5.json"},{"id":15,"name":"Genetics","url":"https://api.seqco.de/v1/subjects/15.json"},{"id":25,"name":"Horticulture","url":"https://api.seqco.de/v1/subjects/25.json"},{"id":24,"name":"Plant Science","url":"https://api.seqco.de/v1/subjects/24.json"}]}